I was debriefing a candidate today—let’s call him Matt—with feedback from one of my clients. As often happens in this cautious market, the process had taken longer than anticipated, and I found myself apologising for the slow turnaround. Matt’s response stopped me in my tracks: “To be honest, Theo, I prefer slow-cooked and correct. I rushed into a job once and it didn’t end well. So let us see where this one takes us.” I paused, reflected, and realised he was absolutely right.
In my 28 years working in executive search and recruitment, I’ve witnessed the fallout from rushed hiring decisions time and again. When pressure mounts to fill a vacancy quickly – whether from operational urgency, budget cycles, or simply impatience – both candidates and clients can make choices they later regret. Candidates accept roles that don’t align with their values or career trajectory, only to find themselves disengaged within months. Clients hire based on immediate need rather than strategic fit, leading to performance issues, cultural misalignment, and the costly cycle of rehiring. The truth is, rushed recruitment seldom works out for either party.
The current market slowdown, challenging as it may be, actually presents a valuable opportunity for candidates seeking their next career move. This period of caution and deliberation gives everyone involved the time to truly evaluate fit – not just skills on paper, but cultural alignment, leadership style, growth potential, and long-term organisational needs. For candidates, it’s a chance to ask the difficult questions: Does this role genuinely excite me? Will I thrive in this environment? Does it take me where I want to go in my career? For clients, it’s the space to look beyond filling a seat and focus on finding someone who will add lasting value to the organisation.
So perhaps we need to reframe how we think about “slow” feedback or extended recruitment processes. Rather than viewing them as frustrating delays, we might see them as the necessary time it takes to get things right. Just as Matt said – slow-cooked and correct beats rushed and regrettable every single time. In a market where the cost of a bad hire extends far beyond the financial, taking the time to ensure genuine alignment isn’t just prudent; it’s essential. The best placements I’ve made in my career have rarely been the fastest ones – they’ve been the thoughtful ones.
In your experience, what are the warning signs that a recruitment process is being rushed – and how have you pushed back to ensure a better outcome?
Remember to subscribe to my newsletter for future insights.